The Right to Privacy by Robert Bork.

Robert Bork's The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v.
Conneticut. Bork's "originalist" view proclaimed that Justice Douglas
erroneously interpreted the right of privacy from the Constitution. The
originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the
Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was
never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts
judges in dealing with new issues that our forefathers could not have possibly
envisioned. The inability of "originalist" to deal with modern and future
problems displays a need for Supreme Court judges to be able to interpret laws
from the Constitution. Without this ability it would be doubtful if people
today could claim a general right to privacy.

The Griswald case involved a bizarre law that forbade the use of condoms in the
hope that it would prevent adulterous affairs. This deduction is as absurd as......

Join Now to view the rest of this term paper!
Members: Login to view this research paper.

Title: The Right To Privacy By Robert Bork.
Approximate Word Count: 802
Approximate Pages: 4 (250 words per double-spaced page)

With the Term Papers Lab Membership Pass, you get instant access to every essay on this site, including this essay on The Right To Privacy By Robert Bork., for as long as you remain a member.

Other essays sites charge almost $100 for a single term paper. At Term Papers Lab, you can get instant access to over 100,000 research papers for as little as $29.95!