An Argument for the Legalization of Drugs, Based on John Stuart Mills' "Revised
Harm Principle"


The question of whether or not to legalize certain drugs has been
debated for decades. Although opponents have thus far been successful in
preventing this, there are nonetheless a substantial number of people who
believe that legalization should be given a chance. Their arguments range from
the seeming ineffectiveness of current drug laws to the simple premise that the
government has no right to prohibit its citizens from using drugs if they
choose to do so. This essay will address the issue from the standpoint of John
Stuart Mills' "Revised Harm Principle²," which asserts that people should be
free to do what they want unless they threaten the vital interests (i.e.,
security or autonomy) of others.
Using Mills' principle as a litmus test for this issue leads one to come
down on the side of legalization. Since Mills is concerned not with individual
rights, but with the......

Join Now to view the rest of this term paper!
Members: Login to view this research paper.

Title: An Argument For The Legalization Of Drugs, Based On John Stuart Mills'
Approximate Word Count: 1015
Approximate Pages: 5 (250 words per double-spaced page)

With the Term Papers Lab Membership Pass, you get instant access to every essay on this site, including this essay on An Argument For The Legalization Of Drugs, Based On John Stuart Mills', for as long as you remain a member.

Other essays sites charge almost $100 for a single term paper. At Term Papers Lab, you can get instant access to over 100,000 research papers for as little as $29.95!