Imagine two students, one depressed and one not, who have both done well on a paper. Using the dimensions of attribution compare the depressed student's attributions to that of the non-depressed student and explain how their attributions correspond to their degree of depression.

As "naïve psychologists" (Hogg & Vaughan, 2002), we make assessments about our environment and come to conclusions about events and behaviour we experience. These attributions we make effect how we feel about situations and our "expectations about future events" (modelling … paper). In the context of failure and success, a non-depressed person will generally attribute success to their own efforts (internal) and attribute failure to circumstantial dimensions (external). This correspondence bias serves to maintain and protect self-esteem in a healthy person (Hogg & Vaughan, 2002). A depressed person will make the opposite attributions. Making internal attributions in the event of failure and external......

Join Now to view the rest of this term paper!
Members: Login to view this research paper.

Title: Imagine Two Students, One Depressed And One Not, Who Have Both Done Well On A Paper. Using The Dimensions Of Attribution Compare The Depressed Student's Attributions To That Of The Non-Depressed Student And Explain How Their Attributions Correspon...
Approximate Word Count: 1279
Approximate Pages: 6 (250 words per double-spaced page)

With the Term Papers Lab Membership Pass, you get instant access to every essay on this site, including this essay on Imagine Two Students, One Depressed And One Not, Who Have Both Done Well On A Paper. Using The Dimensions Of Attribution Compare The Depressed Student's Attributions To That Of The Non-Depressed Student And Explain How Their Attributions Correspon..., for as long as you remain a member.

Other essays sites charge almost $100 for a single term paper. At Term Papers Lab, you can get instant access to over 100,000 research papers for as little as $29.95!